tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6702294928145374276.post5185000106353805575..comments2024-01-03T12:22:42.314-08:00Comments on Trevor Pateman's Philately Blog: St Petersburg / Petrograd Prigorod Fiscals: a Correction!trevor patemanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01843120497490896242noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6702294928145374276.post-4463038207898632542013-04-09T02:26:44.265-07:002013-04-09T02:26:44.265-07:00Thanks Trevor. I've corrected our draft new ed...Thanks Trevor. I've corrected our draft new edition, including renumbering this section. The reversed letter probably was once per sheet, and certainly comes on the IMPERF series of 1883. Now, a question : by the time these stamps got to be perforated in 1901, had the printers corrected the error? Or, is this letter error also found on the 1901 perforated stamps?<br />And, another question : I have not had reports of a 1k or a 25k existing as a perforated stamp? Had these two values been withdrawen by 1901, or do they indeed exist perforated?<br />Currently, my listing of the 1901 perforated issue just runs:<br />19. 3k green<br />20. 5k blue<br />21. 15k orange<br />22. 30k blue.<br />Any additions or corrections from readers?John Barefoothttp://www.jbarefoot.co.uknoreply@blogger.com