All museums and all
collecting hobbies started out by removing things from their context. I can’t
think of an exception. This was very evident in early “cabinets of curiosities”
which were no more than magpie hoards of this, that and the other. Likewise,
the Vatican drawers, created for the purpose, were full of the detached relics
of saints but contained no actual saints.
When stamps were
introduced in 1840, it was the job of post office clerks to remove them from
the sheets - which provided their initial context - so that they could be stuck
onto envelopes. Early collectors promptly removed them from this context of
use, the envelopes onto which they were stuck. Only later did collectors begin
to show an interest in sheets (to which were later added booklets and coils)
and an interest in covers, out of which has developed the hobby of postal history
collecting.
What is now called “Social
philately” is simply an expansion of the context into which collectors place
their stamps or covers and it has been greatly enabled by the ability we all
now have to google something, to find out who wrote a card, who was the
addressee, what a town was like one hundred years ago, and so on. Likewise, serious
stamp collectors have long been interested in stamp printers, the machinery
they used, the inks they sourced, the ways in which they marketed their
services, the scams in which they were involved.
In these ways, stamps and covers are placed in
an ever enlarged context of social and economic relations. But “Social
philately” is really a matter of degree rather than of type. Anyone who ever
googles to find out who wrote or received a letter is engaged in social philately,
even if it is not the main focus of their interest. On this Blog, see this post
as an example of what might be involved:
The potential of social philately is well-illustrated by the
collection held by Boston University where Professor Thomas Glick amassed several
thousand stationery cards from the archives of a pre - 1914 Romanian grain
dealer. The cards allowed the way in which business was done to be
reconstructed from the written texts on the cards and the places from which
they were despatched. They also show a business being conducted in two languages,
Romanian and Yiddish.
See
Many other correspondences
exist which were originally in commercial, family or state archives and which allow
similar reconstruction projects to be undertaken, though often the archives are
quickly dispersed before anyone has the chance to buy them up intact. Similarly,
printers’ archives have been broken up and individual items often command prices
which make any thought of reconstructing the whole archive unrealistic. But it
is entirely possible to reconstruct from a limited set of examples how, for
example, a nineteenth century stamp
printer worked.
No comments:
Post a Comment